12/21/2013

Put Your Trust in God

Feeling depressed?

Down in the dumps?


You need something to raise your spirits. “Read the poem below several times,” Master Kayhan would say, “and you will feel all your troubles evaporate.” This uplifting poem was written
by the Sufi Master, Ibrahim Hakki of Erzurum.




Don’t turn your rose
garden into a briar patch!


—Niyazi Misri

  

1.

Bad things to good, God modifies

Think not He does otherwise

Always watched on by the wise—

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



2.

In God you should put your trust

Surrender yourself, find rest at last

With everything He does, be pleased

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



3.

Put in your heart of His strength a dose

Recognize what He doth dispose

Abandon what you propose

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



4.

He is the Compassionate Creator

He is the Benevolent Provider

He is the Wise and Divine Author

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



5.

The Final Judge in any claim:

Direct your prayers toward Him

Let go of your personal whim

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



6.

Don’t crave after a thing or cause

Don’t be stubborn if one occurs

It’s from God, do not refuse

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



7.

Since matters are in God’s hands, vain

Is any confusion or pain

He unfolds Wisdom divine

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



8.

All His deeds are superior

And in tune with each other

Everything He does is proper

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



9.

Keep sorrows distant from your heart

Find comfort instead in your Lord

Just leave everything to God

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



10.

Don’t deem justice to be malice

Surrender, don’t burn in the Blaze

Don’t give up or give in—patience!

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



11.

Do not say: “Why is this so?”

It is good that it is so

Look, see how the end will go

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



12.

Look down on no one, nor slight

Don’t give offense, don’t break a heart

With your ego never side

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



13.

A believer’s deed is never vice

A wise man’s way is never strife

A sage’s speech won’t agonize

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



14.

His patience is a grace on me

His ruling, my security

The Lord God is my deputy

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



15.

His name resounds in every call

His remembrance in every soul

His rescue is for one and all

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



16.

Just when your hopes are down to nil

Suddenly He parts a veil

He grants solace from every ill

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



17.

In each moment to each servant

Whether wrathful or beneficent

He’s at a task each instant

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



18.

Now Complier and now Preventer

Now Harmer and now Benefiter

Now Debaser and now Upraiser

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



19.

Now He makes His servant a sage

Now malignant, now virtuous

Over every heart He rules

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



20.

Sometimes He makes your heart empty

Or fills your spirit with beauty

Or makes you His loving devotee

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



21.

Simple one time, complex the next

Sometimes He makes your heart perplexed

Happy one moment, sad the next

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



22.

Sparingly eat, sleep, and drink

Give up carnality, it is junk

Settle in the rose garden of the heart

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



23.

Yourself with His creatures do not strain

Nor with your ego remain

You and your heart, keep close the twain

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



24.

With what is past, fall not behind

What is yet to come, don’t mind

Even in the present, don’t reside

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



25.

Unceasingly His name recite

Cunning and shrewdness, cast aside

Admire Truth, Truth articulate

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



26.

Isn’t it time you were amazed

Discover Him, yourself forsake

Cast away sleep, become awake

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



27.

Every word contains advice sound

Every object is much adorned

Every action is a godsend

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



28.

A symbol and portent are all things

A sign of good news are all things

A fountain of grace is everything

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



29.

Lend ear to anyone who speaks

Understand Him who makes him speak

And with all your heart accept

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



30.

The languages of things proclaim

“Truth, O Truth!” they all exclaim

Creation’s courtesy ascertain

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He



31.

Yes, He has done very well

Of course He has done very well

Indeed He has done very well

What God will ordain, let us see

Whatever He does, well does He





Ibrahim Hakki of Erzurum

The Ode of Unity: best intro to the Koran?

It is very difficult for Western readers to get a handle on the Koran. It is not written like books we are accustomed to. The holy book of Islam has remained impenetrable to generations of scholars. Those who attempt to learn about Islam through a study of the Koran often come away from the experience with a bitter taste in their mouths. Translations, which look deceptively simple, conceal the fact that we are here dealing with the most sophisticated and complex of religious texts, a fact which itself often goes unrecognized.
Ahmet Edip Harabi (1853-1917) was a Turkish Sufi poet who spent most of his life in Istanbul. His Ode of Unity (Trk. Vahdetname) is remarkable for laying bare the innermost meanings of the Koran, while at the same time giving a very good summary of many of its highlights. It is, of course, quite impossible to duplicate the meter and rhyme in English without taking great liberties with the meaning, but I believe the Ode affords one of the best short introductions to the Koran. Hence this more-or-less literal translation. Only one word has been changed from the original, and this is indicated in bold below.
Since many references need explanations for the newcomer, I provide these after Harabi’s quatrains where necessary. Not all chapter-and-verse numbers are given at this time, though perhaps these could be supplied in the future. For the time being, it is sufficient if we can understand Harabi’s basic meaning.
In most of the poem, Harabi uses poetic license to speak through the mouth of God, using the first-person majestic form (“We”). Towards the end, he alternates between this and the ordinary human plural.

division

Before either Creator or creature existed
We manifested and proclaimed it.
Before there was any place at all for Adam
We took him in Our abode, We made him Our guest.
He had then as yet no name
He had no substance, let alone name
He had neither outfit, nor a picture
We gave him the exact form of a human being.
In seven layers We built the heavens and earths
In six days the cosmos was finished
We created all these creatures in it
We gave their sustenance, We bestowed on them.
Without ground We created Paradise
We decorated the houris and youths
With many promises to every nation
We pleased them, making them happy and glad.
We dug a hell, oh, so very deep
We adorned it with the fire of pain
Much thinner than a hair, sharper than a sword
We balanced a bridge over it.
This is the Traverse (or Path, Ar. sirat), the bridge over hell — sharper than a sword and thinner than a hair. The righteous will pass over it easily and be rewarded with heaven, while the wicked, bearing the burden of their wrongs, will fall into the gulf of hell. “Balance” refers to the Scales by which the good and bad deeds of a person will be weighed, and one’s fate will be determined accordingly.
As the world was created with the command: “Be!”
We roamed the Throne and Footstool for a while
So that this universe wouldn’t stay empty
We ordered the creation of Adam.
When God desires to create something, he simply says to it “Be,” and it is (e.g. 2:117, 3:47). The “Throne and Footstool” are better understood as the roof and ground of Heaven. The stage is now set for the appearance of Man.
Who is wise knows the obscure secret:
In order to manifest the Greatest Name
We kneaded and fashioned Adam of clay
We sent a spirit from Our Spirit into him.
The creation of humankind is a matter of the most delicate and sublime importance. Only humans are able to manifest the All-comprehensive name of God. God says in the Koran that in order to give life to Adam, He “breathed into him of His Spirit” (32:9, 66:12).
Adam and Eve were together
“What a splendid place we’ve found!” they said.
They ate wheat in Paradise, [for which]
We banished them to one side, we sent them away.
In Islam, the apple of Judeo-Christian tradition is replaced by wheat, or bread. This is the cause for the Fall from Paradise. In other words, partaking of what belongs to the material world is the cause for falling from the spiritual world — like ballast.
Many people came from Adam and Eve
Prophets emerged, saints appeared
The world filled and emptied a hundred thousand times
We sent the Flood to Noah, who was Saved by God.
The story of Noah is much the same as that found in Western tradition, so it does not need recounting here.
lightprophetbig
Prophets seem to have always had difficulty in conveying their message to the peoples they were sent to.

On Salih, We bestowed a camel
It emerged suddenly from a boulder
Many did not believe in this
We razed them to the ground.
Salih is a prophet mentioned in the Koran who was sent to the people of Thamood. They asked for proof, so God sent them a she-camel as a sign. But instead of turning to faith, they hamstrung and killed her (11:61-65) — an ill-advised move.
One time we put the People of the Cave to sleep
We instructed Moses on the Mount
We made Seth a weaver, made him weave cloths
We had Enoch cut it and make it a robe.
Also known as the Seven Sleepers, the People of the Cave were Christians in pre-Islamic times. In order to save them from persecution, God put them to sleep for many years in a cave. Moses was instructed by God on Mount Sinai, and also received the Ten Commandments there.
Every prophet had a vocation. One of the earliest prophets, Seth, was a cloth-weaver. Enoch (or Idris) was a tailor by profession.
charltonhestonmoses
Charlton Heston as Moses in The Ten Commandments (1956)

We made Solomon king of the world
We pitied Job and sent him a cure
We made Jacob cry, we made him weep much
We made Moses a shepherd to Jethro.
Because he wanted it, Solomon became not only the king of Israel, but the king of both the material and the spiritual worlds. Job was tested by losing everything he had, including his health. But then, God took pity on him and restored him to his former health and affluence. Jacob cried so much at the loss of his son Joseph (see next quatrain) that it is said he lost his eyesight. After Moses ran away from Egypt, he served Jethro as a shepherd.
islmuhcombined2
In Islamic art, prophets are often depicted with a fiery halo around their heads, or in a full-body halo of fire. Instances can also be found of the round halo, more familiar from Christian iconography. Left: During the Night Journey of his Ascension, Mohammed meets up with the Five Great Prophets (Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus) in Jerusalem. Right: Mohammed addresses his followers from the pulpit.

We had Joseph thrown into a well
We had him sold as a slave in Egypt
We had Zulaykha pester him
For his error We made him a cell’s prisoner.
The story of Joseph and his brothers is narrated in Chapter 12 of the Koran. Joseph was famous for his male beauty. Jealous of him, his brothers threw him into a well and told their father, Jacob, that wolves had devoured him.
Joseph himself was aware of his beauty, but it went to his head: like Narcissus, he fell victim to self-love. “If I were a slave, I would be priceless,” he thought to himself. The Koran tells us that for this reason, he was sold as a slave in Egypt for a single farthing.
Zulaykha was the wife of Joseph’s master. She fell madly in love with him, and when she failed to get her way with him, she framed Joseph. However, the real reason he was jailed was because he said “I’m innocent.” This claim was not entirely true, and incurred God’s displeasure.
We made the prophet David play the zither
We saved Lot and Hood from bad endings
See what we did to Nimrod’s fire
We made it an orchard for Abraham.
King David was also a musician, and it is believed he played the zither (or harp). The prophet Lot was saved from the terrible fate that befell Sodom and Gomorrah.
Hood was a prophet mentioned in the Koran sent to the people of Ad. They refused to believe in his message, and came to a bad end. Hood himself, however, was saved (11:50-60).
Nimrod, a pharaoh-like ruler, had a raging fire built, and threw the patriarch Abraham into it with a catapult. However, God protected Abraham, commanding the fire to be “cool and safe towards Abraham” (21:69). The furious center of the fire became a rose garden for him.
Abrahamgardenmidstflames1
 Abraham in a rose garden amidst the flames.

We sent from heaven a sacrifice as compensation 
For Ishmael, the Friend of the Compassionate was elated
For quite a long time We decreed
the belly of the fish a lodging for Jonah.
The “Friend of the Compassionate” is of course Abraham, the father of Ishmael and Isaac. In Islamic lore, Ishmael is usually accepted as the son to be sacrificed. This is an unbearable test for Abraham. Just as he is about to sacrifice his son, a ram is sent down from heaven for Abraham to sacrifice instead.
Jonah gave up hope of ever convincing his people, and departed on a ship. God had not said so, however, and a huge storm came up, the result of which was that Jonah jumped overboard and was swallowed by a huge fish. After what some say was forty days, it regurgitated Jonah on a distant shore.
We ensconced Mother Mary in a temple of prostration,
There, without a father, We caused Jesus to be born
In a tree We had Zachariah
Cut up, and his blood spilled.
Islam agrees with the Virgin Birth of Jesus. Zachariah fled from his people and hid in the hollow of a tree, but his people found him and sawed down the tree with Zachariah inside.
At the Holy Temple in Jerusalem
At the Sharia River, the Jordan River
For cleansing, one day
We made John and Jesus naked.
Another name for the Jordan River is the Sharia, which connects the Sea of Galilee to the Dead Sea. It is famous because John the Baptist baptized Jesus in its waters.
With such frolics We passed the time
We finished a lot of business with these prophets
We introduced another Glorious Prophet
We made his every word the Koran.
islmuh1
In Islamic depictions of Mohammed, his face is often veiled, because nobody knows what the Prophet looked like and no likeness would do him justice. It is also thought to be disrespectful.

We made the faithless of Quraysh a pretext
Mohammed Mustapha was born into the world
In order to invite the people to faith
We made Murtaza his friend and companion.
Quraysh is Mohammed’s tribe. “Murtaza” is Ali, the Prophet’s cousin and son-in-law. Ali was one of the Prophet’s greatest supports.
No prophet can compare with him
The Beloved of God is the king of prophets
He is the owner of this world and the next
We made him the Glorious Prophet.

division

Up to this point, Harabi has given us a straightforward, though of course much abridged and concise, reading of the Koran. It is also a brief history of the prophets. Of course, there are many lessons to be learned from the example of the prophets. But what does it all signify?
Now Harabi comes to the crux of everything. He is about to reveal the meaning of it all. In a dazzling summary and conclusion, he goes straight to the heart of the matter.
Think not everyone fathoms these words
‘Tis birdsong, which Solomon knows
The wise [alone] discern this obscure secret
Because We hid it from the ignorant.
King Solomon was given the understanding of the Language of States. He could converse with all animals, including birds. Now Harabi reverts to the human “we”:
We were Real with the Real in past eternity
On the day of “Am I not” and the “Yea” reply
In the place of the Lord, in the Clear Gathering
We saw His Face and asserted our faith.
According to the Koran, when God created all human spirits in the eternal past, He gathered them all in an immense expanse, and asked them: “Am I not your Lord?” They answered “Yes” (7:172).
The person who does not know the World of Unity
Remained a fool in human form
The Lord God is not separate from us
We made this clear with the Koran.
Our words are indeed as certain as can be
Who is born, who dies, who does and undoes — is all the Real
Wherever you look is Absolute Reality
We proclaimed the states of Unity.
As the Koran says: “Whichever way you turn, there is the Face of God” (2:115). “He is with you wherever you are” (57:4). (Such gems are tucked away in corners, and you will miss them unless you know where to look.)
For those who enter the palace of Unity
For those who see the Real with the Truth of Certainty
For those who know this secret, Harabi,
We circulated in the square of Unity.

(It was customary for poets to place their names in the final couplet or quatrain of the poems they wrote.)
(The Turkish original can be found here, pp. 103-105.)

Seven Heavens, Five Presences


7h0
(Click here for larger view.)
How does Being give rise to Becoming? How does the infinite, changeless, timeless nature of the Godhead engender an infinitude of finite, ever-changing, fleeting entities? In short, how does Unity give rise to Multiplicity?
This used to be a serious concern for philosophers of old. The problem was finally solved by the Sufis—and expounded most notably by Ibn Arabi—who relied on direct spiritual experience and knowledge rooted in that experience, rather than on pure reasoning and abstract thinking. They did, however, at times attempt to use terms and concepts borrowed from philosophy, in order to convey their experiences intelligibly.
The solution they suggested was as follows: pure Being does not, all of a sudden, create Becoming, just like that. This is not a matter of white versus black. Rather, just as there is a whole spectrum of colors between ultraviolet and infrared, Being creates Becoming gradually, through a series of levels of existence. There are ontological stages through which Being gradually passes into Becoming.
Professor William Chittick has been studying this matter for half a century, and has painstakingly developed a terminology in English closely corresponding to Ibn Arabi’s constellation of concepts in Arabic. He has succeeded in finding a different English term for each concept or word used by Ibn Arabi. Here, I shall be concerned more with ease of understanding than with precision. Hence, those seeking the latter are referred to Chittick’s voluminous works. I shall resort to short-cuts and simplifications which may not be entirely rigorous, but which will, hopefully, make the subject at hand more readily comprehensible.

7h1

The Koran states: God “created the seven heavens in layers” (67:3).
At first, one may suppose that what is meant here is the Seven Paradises of the Afterlife. However, this is not the case. The literal meaning is that God “created seven skies/space(s) (in) stages/layers.” This has to do with our present world.
Does it, then, mean the seven planetary spheres of Antiquity? Again, this is not the case. Premodern thinkers loved to systematize their thoughts around simple numbers: the four elements, the five Platonic solids, the seven planets corresponding to seven metals, the twelve signs of the Zodiac… We find the same tendency even in alchemy, which has survived until comparatively recent times.
7h2
The ancients believed in a geocentric universe. Modern science does not substantiate this view.
Modern science has shown that such pat schemas do not hold up to scrutiny. There are more than a hundred elements, there are literally hundreds of elementary particles, there are billions of galaxies, each with hundreds of billions of stars, separated from each other by billions of light years. The universe is much more vast and complicated than our forefathers could have imagined. The picture modern science draws for us defies neat categorization.
Yet human beings have a need both for simplicity and systematization. Despite these findings, science is organized knowledge, and the search to explain the universe by a final, elegant “theory of everything” goes on.
So let us return to the Koranic verse above. We can understand it as follows: every space has a boundary, a “sky” which limits it, succeeded by the next “layer.” Astronomers of the past conceived of the world in terms of a series of concentric, nested spheres: the sphere of the sun, the sphere of the moon, the sublunary sphere, the sphere of Mercury, and so on, all centered around the earth. Modern science has shown such spheres to be nonexistent. Yet there is a sense in which science has not invalidated the essential point of this. In geometry, we can conceive of a one-dimensional line, extending from minus infinity to plus infinity. The line is bounded, yet infinite. It can be conceived of as lying in a two dimensional plane. The plane, too, is bounded, yet infinite. It, in turn, lies within three-dimensional space. And while it is difficult—perhaps impossible—for us to visualize higher mathematical dimensions, it is possible to think, conceptually and abstractly, of higher-dimensional spaces in which a three-dimensional space is itself nested. Another—this time numerical—example of an infinite sequence tending to a finite limit is the progression 1 + ½ + ¼ + 1/8 + 1/16 +1/32…, which has a limit of 2. Although the number of terms is infinite, their sum is not. By analogy, then, the “seven spaces” each can be conceived of as having limits—their “skies”—within which they are confined, even if they happen to be infinite in some respect(s).

The Five Divine Presences
We can now look at a fundamental conception of Ibn Arabi, the ontological layers of the “Five Divine Presences.” Although Ibn Arabi did not develop this classification explicitly, it is inherent in his work. In an article that is still timely, Professor Chittick has compared the ways Ibn Arabi’s closest followers and commentators have understood his “Five Presences” (hadarat al-hams).
Chittick states: “These then are the Five Divine Presences as explained by Ibn al‘Arabi’s foremost disciple [Qunawi]: the (1) Divine, (2) spiritual, (3) imaginal, (4) sensory and (5) all-comprehensive, human levels.” Note that the Perfect Human (the insan al-kâmil) merits a Presence all by itself (level 5), and encompasses all preceding stages.
Let us now skip to the end of Chittick’s article:
By now it has become clear that there is no set description of the Five Divine Presences that all Sufis have followed. On the contrary, even in the works of these five figures, who wrote within 100 years of one another and were closely bound together by master-disciple relationships, there are several different interpretations. … By Its very Unknowability God’s inmost nature seems to preclude any sharp and fast definitions. But the overall scheme remains the same: The whole of Reality is divided into the Uncreated and the created; the latter in turn is divided into three primary levels (Spirits, Corporeal-Bodies and an Isthmus lying between the two); and a fifth reality [the Perfect Human]—whether specifically mentioned or only implied—comprehends all the levels.1

7h3
Some Basic Concepts
To delve a little deeper into the conceptual world of the Sufis, and to familiarize ourselves with the Five Divine Presences, we need to understand how they use certain terms.
Ta’ayyun is determination (the created realm), Lâ Ta’ayyun is nondetermination (the Uncreated realm). The latter corresponds to “unconditioned Brahman” (nirguna Brahman) in Hinduism, whereas Ta’ayyun corresponds to “conditioned Brahman” (saguna Brahman). Chittick’s preferred translation for this term is “entification” (that is, to become an entity). An entity is finite, that is, bound or determined in many respects, whereas the Essence or Person (dhat/zat) of God is beyond all limitations. This is closely related to delimitation (taqyid), with the Absolute being the Nondelimited (mutlaq). In this connection, Sufis also use the terms Lâ makân, Nonspace (or placelessness), and Lâ zaman, Nontime (or timelessness), for space and time have not yet been created. Rather, as God tells the Grand Saint Abdul Qader Geylani in an inspiration, “I am the space for space”—that is, God encompasses all spaces.
To elaborate, the Prophet was asked: “Where was God before He created the universe?” He answered: “In a cloud (amâ), with no air above or below it”—that is, in an infinite cloud. (Ibn Arabi explains that amâ is normally a thin cloud surrounded by air.) The word has also been associated with darkness and unseenness, but these are secondary meanings. As Chittick explains, “Within the Cloud the cosmos in its entirety takes shape.”2
Next we come to Ibn Arabi’s concept of ayan al-thabita, a concept notoriously difficult to translate. Among other renditions, we find “permanent archetypes,”3 “immutable essences,” “fixed entities,” or even “immutable identities.” Apparently, a perfectly fitting term is yet to be found.
Perhaps we can begin to approach an understanding of the ayan al-thabita by recourse to Plato’s Ideas:
Plato defends a clear ontological dualism in which there are two types of realities or worlds: the sensible world and the intelligible world or, as he calls it, the world of the Ideas. The Sensible World is the world of individual realities, and so is multiple and constantly changing, is the world of generation and destruction; is the realm of the sensible, material, temporal and spa[tial] things. On the contrary, the Intelligible World is the world of the universal, eternal and invisible realities called Ideas (or “Forms“), which are immutable and do not change because they are not material, temporal or [spatial]. Ideas can be understood and known; they are the authentic reality. The Ideas or Forms are not just concepts or psychic events of our minds; they do exist as objective and independent beings out[side] our [consciousness]. They are also the origin of sensible things, but although they are the authentic beings, Plato, unlike Parmenides of Elea, do[es] not completely deny the reality of the sensible things…4
This is rather similar to the distinction Ibn Arabi draws:
Possible things are things which become ‘existent entities’ (a’yan mawjuda) when God chooses to give them existence; their existence or non-existence at any given time depends on his will. They have, however, been known to him eternally as ‘immutable entities’ (a’yan thabita).5
The prime, and perhaps the crucial, difference seems to be that the ayan al-thabita are objects of God’s knowledge. And they are nothing like the “universals” of philosophy, such as “table,” “tree,” or “cat,” though a parallel cannot be gainsaid. Nor do they have anything to do with Jungian archetypes.6
Let’s start simple
In the simplest scheme pertaining to the ontological stages of creation, Nondetermination gives rise to three levels of determination. This is somewhat similar to the “three hypostases” of Plotinus. This does not imply that Sufis were “influenced” by Plotinus, but that as a mystic, he shared a similar experience with them. To recall Josiah Royce’s words, “The mystics are the most thorough-going empiricists in the history of philosophy.”
However, Sufis would not agree with the way Plotinus assigns the three hypostases:
1. The One (ineffable, transcendent)

2. Intellect (The Realm of Being—contains the Platonic Forms)

3. Soul (contains the seminal reasons)

The Physical World of Becoming7
Rather, assuming they agreed with these categories, they would perhaps order them as follows:
The One (Ar. al-Ahad, one of God’s Names)

1. Intellect

2. Soul (spirit)

3. The Physical World of Becoming
We would then have the levels of Nondetermination and three determinations.
The Grand Saint Abdul Qader Geylani has declared:
Creation is like the snow. In other words, all creatures are representatives in the bodies in which they appear. But they are like snow; they have no independent existence of their own. For the existence of snow is the existence of water.8
This gives us the opportunity to better understand Nondetermination and the three determinations. At this moment, in the air, we know that water vapor is present, but we cannot see it. It is invisible to us. This is like the state of Nondetermination. When water vapor cools and condenses, however, we can see it as fogging on a window pane, or as mist, or as clouds in the sky. This is water in the state of a gas, as visible steam. This corresponds to the first determination.
As the cooling continues, we will see water in its liquid form: as rain, rivers, seas, or a glass of water. This corresponds to the second determination. Further cooling results in the solid state: water as snow or ice. And this corresponds to the third determination. But whatever state it is in, it is all the same H2O.

More Detailed Versions
As can be seen from the following table,9 different Sufis have given the details of the further subdivision of these stages in different ways. And this is where the gradations begin to get more complex.
7h4
 1 This is a modified version of Ibn Arabi’s thinking. He leaves out Hahut and appends Insan al-Kâmil at the end.
Hahut is from Huwiyya, “identity”or “Ipseity.” Similarly, Lahut
comes from Uluhiyya, “Divinity.” The color background reminds
us that transitions between worlds are not abrupt but gradual.
Why this diversity of opinion? Three reasons come to mind:
  1. The number of levels of existence are actually infinite. Classifying them on five or six levels is to a certain extent arbitrary, so people have exercised independent judgment in this respect.
  2. Some have not bothered to make the distinctions that others have made, while some have dwelled on distinctions that others have passed over.
  3. Sometimes different people refer to the same level by different names.

Conclusion
Can we reconcile Ibn Arabi’s Five Divine Presences with the Seven Heavens mentioned in the Koran? I believe we can. For what it’s worth, my own, admittedly tentative, take on the Seven Heavens follows.
In various Sayings, the Prophet stated: “The first thing God created was my spirit/my light/the Pen/the Intellect. He created everything else from that.”
Since we have this as a given, it seems only appropriate to begin any account of existence with the First Light or the Universal Intellect (aql al-kull; also known as the First Intellect, aql al-awwal).
The Pen (kalam) is actually a shaft of white light; in Europe they called it Calamus, in a quaint latinization. It is represented by the first letter of the Arabic alphabet, the Alif, which is a vertical straight line.
The goal of existence is the Perfect Human. The purpose of Becoming is to return to Being. All things tend towards that end. So we are all on a journey to our homeland. As Edward Fitzgerald translates two of the last couplets of Attar’s Conference of the Birds,
Come, you lost Atoms, to your Centre draw,
And be the Eternal Mirror that you saw:
Rays that have wander’d into Darkness wide
Return, and back into your Sun subside.
Once this goal was set, you could say that God “reverse-engineered” the rest of the universe from that, working backwards in the design conceptualization. So not only is the strong Anthropic Principle true—not only were the parameters of the universe adjusted to make room for human existence—but an even stronger Anthropic Principle holds, in that those parameters were set to allow for the existence of the Perfect Human. Rarity of rarities, the Perfect Human represents the full blossoming of the universe’s potential.
So there must be six stages (corresponding roughly to six “days”—7:54, 10:3, 11:7, etc.) after the Pen. Each stage is a “shadow”10 (as Qunawi calls it) or projection of the one preceding it. We may imagine the following sequence (and remember, this is ontological, not temporal, for space and time do not yet exist):
  1. God decides to create the universe. That is, the Essence of God, as Absolute Unity or Unmanifest Absolute, decides to manifest Itself/Himself, passing to the phase of the Manifest Absolute or Unicity. For the process to begin, the first thing to be created is the Pen: namely, the First Light or First Intellect.
  2. The Pen generates the World of Power (Jabarut), which has also been called the Realm of Invincibility. This is the real crucible of creation. Unicity gives rise to a myriad Divine Attributes at the initial stages (the “top”) of the Pen, and for each Attribute there is a corresponding Name. For instance, one Attribute of God is Life, so the corresponding Name is “the Living.” All living things are informed (“in-formed”) by this Attribute. Another Attribute of God is Knowledge, and the corresponding Name is “Omniscient” or “All-knowing.” This is also the stage at which the ayan al-thabita are engendered, for they are objects of God’s Knowledge.
  3. Each Attribute gives rise to a myriad Actions of God, which will be “inherited” by creatures at the succeeding levels. For instance, the Attribute of Life gives rise to the actions, in living organisms, of motion, self-preservation, and reproduction. In higher organisms, it gives rise to such actions as breathing, running and eating.
  4. The next Presence is the Angelic World. This is the level of spirits, and can be subdivided into three. First, the World of Angelic beings, that is, of higher spirits.
  5. Then the World of Spirits, that is, the spirits of human beings.
  6. And the Imaginal World, also called an Isthmus (Barzakh), because it is an intermediate world interfacing between the world of spirit and the world of matter.
  7. Finally, the sensible, sensory, material, or phenomenal world. This is the physical universe, or the everyday world we live in.
So, to summarize:

7h5
Where the physical world corresponds to:
 7h6
 (Click here for larger view. Click here to view the scales separately, here for horizontal version. Originals here.)

But of course, God and His Prophet know best.



1. William Chittick, “The Five Divine Presences: From al-Qunawi to al-Qaysari,”
Muslim World, 72 (1982) 107-28.
2. William C. Chittick, The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-Arabi’s Metaphysics of Imagination, p. 125.
3. Toshihiko Izutsu, Sufism and Taoism: A Comparative Study of Key Philosophical Concepts [1967], Chapter 12: “Permanent Archetypes,” pp. 159-191.
4. Plato’s Philosophy – Summary.
6. Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila, “The Immutable Entities and Time.”
8. Geylani, “The Mysteries Of Unification,” in The Meaning of the Four Books, p. 319.
9. Column information:
Ibn Arabi: “Sufi Cosmology.”
Kâshâni 1: Yasushi Tonaga, “The School of Ibn Arabi in Mashriq and Turkey With Special Reference to Abd Al-Karim Al-Jili.”
Ibrahim Hakki: Ibrahim Hakki of Erzurum, Marifetname [1757], Section 19.17.
Other (Izutsu) (Kâshâni 2): Toshihiko Izutsu, Sufism and Taoism…, p. 11.
10. Sadreddin Konevi, Kırk Hadis Şerhi ve Tercümesi (“Forty Traditions: Commentary and Translation,” Turkish tr. By H. Kâmil Yilmaz), pp. 23, 78, 137. (Note that despite its title, this comprises only 29 Traditions.)

12/20/2013

The Symbols in the Fig Chapter





God’s-eye view. “A Flight Through the Universe,” by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, displays close to 400,000 galaxies, each with one or two hundred billion stars, some many times the mass of our sun. And please bear in mind that there are maybe a hundred billion of these galaxies. Click here for the 3D version (you will need anaglyph 3D glasses).


God... created [Mohammed] as a light within a column of light, a million years before creation... (Re 53:13)
Sahl al-Tustari
(on the Light of Mohammed, in the first Sufi Commentary on the Koran)


(In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful.)
By the Fig and the Olive,
and Mount Sinai,
and this land secure (Mecca):
We indeed created Man in the fairest stature,
Then We reduced him to the lowest of the low,
Save those who believe and do good deeds, and theirs is a reward unfailing.
(The Fig, 95:1-6)

Over the centuries, a literal reading of the Fig Chapter in the Koran does not seem to have produced much light. Taking the words at face value has yielded references to trees and mountains, or at best, to the prophets with which these are related. The fig and the olive are associated with Jesus, Mount Sinai (quite naturally) with Moses, and the secure land or territory with Mohammed.
In what follows, I would like to suggest an alternative reading. I propose to treat the named entities as symbols. Perhaps this approach will yield a more satisfying explanation as to why God wishes to swear an oath by them rather than directly by the prophets involved. There are two reasons for this:
  • God does not take an oath idly. Among other things, an oath in the Koran is intended to draw our attention to some subtlety which may otherwise be missed.
  • The Koran has already named these prophets explicitly elsewhere. Why, then, refer to them obliquely here?
First, of course, we must define what we understand by “ symbol.”
To paraphrase Martin Lings, a symbol is a shadow or projection of a higher reality. It is a metaphor, a “bridge” (majaz) to understanding something that is more complex, elusive, and abstract.

tb1
A reality can be expressed by more than one symbol. Put another way, different symbols can point to the same reality. Similarly, the three-dimensional complex object (call it “Geb”) at the left has three different two-dimensional projections on three mutually perpendicular planes. So Geb can be represented by G, E, and/or B in two dimensions. Likewise, the object at right can be represented by U, D (or A), and T. (Front cover design, 20th Anniversary Edition of Douglas R. Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid [1979].)
Let, us, therefore, investigate the items named in the chapter for their symbolic content, in the order of their appearance.

The Fig
The first item on our list is the fig, from which the chapter (sura) also gets its name. What could it be referring to? Let us approach this question by means of the World Tree. (Added emphases are in bold.)
[The notion] of a cosmologically sacred tree, or tree of life, is found throughout the world. In the ancient Brahman tradition of India, and among Shamans of Central Asia, the sacred tree was considered the symbolic axis of the [world]. … The cosmic tree appears as an inverted tree with its roots in heaven growing downward towards the earth as depicted in the Upanishads of India and medieval Cabbalistic writings (Wikipedia, “Tree of Life,” 2013). A symbolic Mountain of Paradise and the four rivers of life are also motifs found beyond Persia.1
The idea of an erect [upright] and of an inverted Tree is met with over a range of time and space extending from Plato to Dante and Siberia to India and Melanesia.2
Of paramount interest to us is the identification of the World Tree with the fig tree:
the World Tree, the cosmic and supracosmic Tree of Life, which stretches along the length of the Axis Mundi [World Axis] passing through and connecting all of the created order—all worlds and beings—at the centre… is described in its inverted aspect in the Upanishads, ‘Its root is above, its branches below—This eternal fig-tree (asvattha)! That indeed is Pure. That is Brahma.’ … [And also in the] Bhagavadgītā, ‘Men tell of the changeless Fig-tree, with roots that upward rise and branches that descend’…3
“This is an eternal Ashwattha tree whose root is above, but its branches are downward. It is He that is called the Bright One and Brahman, and Immortality, and in Him are all the worlds established, none goes beyond Him. This is what you seek.”4
Ananda Coomaraswamy provides some more information:
the One Asvattha is identified with Brahman … A twofold division, cosmic and supracosmic, of the Axial Column … stands in part within the cosmos and in what is a greater part also out beyond the sky. … the Axis of the Universe is, as it were, a ladder on which there is a perpetual going up and down. … 5
tb2 
The word Miraj (Ascension) literally means “ladder.” A chapter in the Koran is named “Ascensions.” “…the angels and the Spirit descend, by the leave of their Lord, for every errand” (97:4).

Coomaraswamy also reminds us that “This pillar is omnipresent and passes through the centre of every being.” Keith Critchlow adds that this ‘is described as a “ray joining every being to the spiritual sun”.’6 And Plato—whom a great Sufi, Jili, once saw in a vision as “filling the world with light”—compared man to an upside-down tree, whose roots are in the heavens and whose branches tend downwards to earth.7

Now a tree with its roots in heaven and its branches downwards is also known in Islam. It is called the Tree of Bliss or the Tree of Happiness (tūbā). Thus, we may read the Fig tree (in its inverted form) as an equivalent symbol of the Tuba tree.*
Another tree, the Shajarat-al Tūbā … is prominent in aḥādith [Sayings of the Prophet] and in the writings of later mystics. The Shajarat-al Tūbā was described by Ibn al-ʿArabī [the great Sufi mystic] in his Futūhāt al Makkiya as growing down from the roof of Heaven and penetrating all of the spheres of Heaven. … This tree he calls the Tree of happiness or bliss (tūbā)’ …8
The word tūbā (pronounced “two-baa”) occurs in the Koran (13:28) without reference to a tree. However, the tree of that name is well established in the Prophet’s Sayings: for example, “the Tuba is a tree in Paradise.  God planted it with His own hand and breathed His spirit into it.”9
tb3
The inverted tree, with its roots in heaven and its fruits on earth, or (according to Ibn Arabi) growing down from the roof of Heaven and penetrating all of the spheres of Heaven. Right: picture of the Tuba Tree (circa 1900), with the 99 Beautiful Names of God written on its leaves and the Banner of Praise (liva al-hamd) of the Prophet on its right. Whoever holds on to one of its leaves (that is, recites one of God’s Names) is said to be pulled up to Heaven. At the bottom are the Eight Gates of Paradise.

Here is Ibn Arabi on the Tuba in his Meccan Revelations (Futuhat-ul Makkiya):
The Tree of Tuba compared to all other trees of Paradise is like Adam who was the origin of mankind, for when [God] planted and set it right, He blew of His spirit into it… He adorned it with decorations and garments that beatify their wearers. We are its earth as He has made ‘whatever is on the earth an adornment for it’ (18:7). It gave the fruits of Paradise all the truth they have, as a stone of date produces a palm tree, and the light which those fruits carry.10
 tb4
Sometimes the Cosmic Mountain (see below) and the Cosmic Tree symbols are combined, as in the Scandinavian World Tree Yggdrasil. Of the Tuba Tree, Laleh Bakhtiyar states: “Tuba, in its macrocosmic form, grows at the uppermost limits of the universe.  In its microcosmic form, its cultivation depend[s] upon the mystic. … Ibn ‘Arabi describes this symbol in both its forms.  In its macrocosmic aspect, it is associated with the Cosmic Mountain on top of which the Cosmic Tree grows.”

Bakhtiyar continues:
The whole of the cosmos is seen as a tree, the Tree of Knowledge, which has grown from the seed of the Divine Command, “Be”.  The Tree has sent down its roots, sent up its trunk, and spread out its branches, so that this world, the world of Symbols, and the world of Archetypes, are all contained by this Tree.
As the Tree is manifest in a macrocosmic aspect, so it is hidden in the microcosmic form.  It is the symbol of wisdom which, through roots in meditation, bears fruit of the Spirit.11

tb5
Because the Tree of Bliss grows downwards from the roof of heaven, many domes of mosques and shrines in Islam have highly abstract, stylized representations of the Tuba. The dome itself symbolizes heaven. (Left: Tilla-Kari Medrassah at Registan, Samarkand, Uzbekistan. Right: interior of Taj Mahal mosque, India.)
tb6 
The dome of this mosque is distinguished by the fact that the Tree of Happiness is depicted both on its exterior and its interior. Note the sunburst design with an eight-pointed star at its apex, and the daisy-like, mirrored spiral pattern. (Dome of Shaykh Lutfullah mosque, Isfahan, Iran.)

tb7
A Fibonacci Spiral is duplicated and the circular pattern is mirrored. When assembled, the result forms the pattern seen in sunflowers.

(The Tuba tree has also been associated with the Indian Kalpavriksha tree because it fulfills all desires.)
Finally, Henry Corbin equates the Tuba Tree with Ibn Arabi’s Cosmic Tree (shajarat al kawn): “…the Tuba tree; now, we know that this is the name of the tree that shades Paradise; it is the Tree of Being [another name for the Cosmic Tree].”12 But Ibn Arabi claims that this tree stands for the Perfect Human (see below). We have, then, established a link between the Fig and the Perfect Human, which is also the Light of Mohammed.

The Olive
The treatment for the Olive follows closely upon that for the Fig. Let me quote from an earlier article:
In his treatise on Cosmic Unification (al-Ittihad al-Kawn, translated as The Universal Tree and the Four Birds), the famous Sufi, Ibn Arabi, equates the Universal Tree (al-shajara al-kulli) or World Axis with the Perfect Human Being. (Ibn Arabi’s other “tree,” the World Tree or Cosmic Tree (Shajarat al-Kawn), also symbolizes the Universal Human.) In addition, the Tree stands for eternal life, and is called the Tree of Life in some traditions. Another name for it is the Tree of Light (A. J. Wensinck, Tree and Bird as Cosmological Symbols in Western Asia (1921)). That light beam (also called the Ray of Creation) is, in Sufism, the first-created light, the First Intellect (Universal Mind) or the Light of Mohammed (these occur in the Prophet’s own Sayings). This is the light that is referred to in Genesis: “God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light” (Gen. 1:3).
For Islam, the olive is the central tree, The World Axis, a symbol of Universal Man and of the Prophet. The ‘Blessed Tree’ is associated with light, since its oil is used as lamp fuel. (The Penguin Dictionary of Symbols, p. 716.)
And this brings us to another part of the Light Verse: “[The lamp] is lighted from a Blessed Tree, an olive neither of the East nor of the West [hence of the center], whose light would well-nigh shine out even if it were not lit by fire” [hence self-luminous] (24:35).
The first Arabic letter, the Alif, also represents the Cosmic Pillar because of its shape. …13
Here we need only add that in Islam, the “Straight Path” to be followed (sirat al-mustaqim) is not only a road without bends, but also means the “Ascending Path” along the vertical axis, because of the root word qam (“to raise oneself”).14 Hence the Alif also represents the Straight Path itself, namely, elevation along the axis of consciousness or spirituality, which is perpendicular to all dimensions.15

tb8
Mountains, trees, and pointed man-made structures are all equivalent symbols for the Cosmic Mountain or Pillar of the Universe. (From left: Mt. Machapuchare, Nepal; pine tree; Wat Arun, Bangkok; Cheops Pyramid, Egypt)

Mount Sinai
According to psychologist Carl G. Jung, “The mountain stands for the goal of the pilgrimage and ascent, hence it often has the psychological meaning of the self.” 16
Mount Sinai is, of course, the mountain specific to Moses, but before we talk about that, we must talk about mountains in general, which lead to the archetype of the Cosmic Mountain.
What is the Cosmic Mountain? It is a mode of, or an alternate symbol for, the World Axis. It represents the cosmos. Not confined to the physical universe, it spans the whole of existence—“the eighteen thousand worlds,” as the Sufis call it.
At its base and beneath it are the various hells. Below the clouds that surround it, there is lightning, thunder and rain. But above the clouds it is always sunshine. According to scholar of comparative religion Mircea Eliade,
In several traditions, the Cosmos is shaped like a mountain whose peak touches heaven: above, where the heavens and the earth are reunited, is the Center of the World. This cosmic mountain may be identified with a real mountain, or it can be mythic, but it is always placed at the center of the world.17
The ziggurat was literally a cosmic mountain; the seven stories represented the seven planetary heavens; by ascending them, the priest reached the summit of the universe.18
As for the peak:
The summit of the cosmic mountain is not only the highest point of the earth; it is also the earth’s navel, the point at which the Creation began.19
According to Indian beliefs, Mount Meru rises at the center of the world, and above it shines the polestar. The Ural-Altaic peoples also know of a central mountain, Sumeru, to whose summit the polestar is fixed. 20
tb9 
Mount Meru or Mt. Sumeru (“Beautiful Meru”), the Hindu conception of the Cosmic Mountain. Above are the heavens, below are the hot and cold hells. Its height was said to be more than a million kilometers, a large enough number in an age when people had not yet heard about billions of light-years. At the top is the City of Brahma (God).

 tb10
The World Axis is considered to pass through the Pole Star, and the Center of the World to be its terrestrial footprint, because the axis of the Earth’s rotation points towards the Pole Star, “the center of heaven.” In this case, the Axis of the Universe becomes identified with the Axis of the Earth. Naturally, the situation depicted in this time-lapse photo can be observed everywhere north of the equator, so that on this basis, any location in the northern hemisphere can be called “the Center of the World” with equal justification. (The star cannot be seen from the southern hemisphere.) Please bear in mind that this is, again, symbolic. The Pole Star is also the star at the top of a christmas tree, which has the shape of a mountain.

As for the Sufis, they consider the mountain to represent the human body, and more specifically the head, with all its equipment (sense organs, brain, mind, etc.). For example, Yunus Emre 21 says:
Within a mountain, I beheld
The eighteen thousand worlds
where “mountain” means the body.
Now as for Mount Sinai, its story is too well-known for repetition. Moses retired there twice for forty days each, returning with the tablets on which the Ten Commandments were inscribed. What we shall focus on here is the Koranic version of what transpired on the mountain. When Moses was approaching the Burning Bush for the first time, he was instructed: “Take off your sandals” (20:12). According to Master Kayhan, “the sandals are his self.”
The really important event occurs when Moses implores God, “Let me see You.” God replied, “You cannot see Me. 22 But I shall manifest Myself to this mountain and if it can stand it, then you can see Me” (7:143). But the mountain shattered and Moses was knocked unconscious.
Here is what the Master had to say:
Mount Sinai is mentioned in the Torah, but it’s not a mountain – it’s Moses’ ‘mountain’! Moses’ Mount Sinai is his head.
Is there anyone who has seen this mountain, this Mount Sinai? Show me this mountain. Here is that mountain [the head], it’s this, this.
Let’s work on this mountain a little bit, okay? This head is the antenna of the eighteen thousand worlds, it’s the antenna of the Torah, the Psalms, the Gospel and the Quran. 23
tb11 
Mount Sinai (left, otherwise known as Jabal Musa, the Mountain of Moses); Mount Hira (right, otherwise known as Jabal Nur, the Mountain of Light; so called because fires used to be lit on its summit as a beacon for travelers)

The Secure Land
The “land secure” has traditionally been accepted as Mecca and its environs. Here there are three noteworthy locations: Mount Hira, the Cave of Hira, and the mosque of the Kaaba.

Mount Hira and the Cave
We have already dealt with the case of Mount Sinai. The case of Mount Hira is quite similar. Both are versions of the Cosmic Mountain. Furthermore, the first is the retreat of Moses, the second that of Mohammed. And in that mountain there is a cave. It is where the Truth was revealed to the Prophet of God.
Traditionally, the cave has also been considered as a symbol for the Heart. 24 If we follow this line of reasoning, there is something quite remarkable about the Cave of Hira. It is a very small cave, more like a niche (mishkat) or alcove, barely enough for one person. There is an opening at the bottom of the cave, oriented towards the Kaaba. Light streams in through that crack. So the main entrance of the cave is for people, the far end is for light. And the same holds for the Cave of the Heart: one end is your side, through the other end enters Light (the Light of God).
The Master used to relate how the Prophet of God used to leave the bosom of his beloved wife, Khadija, and go to that cave to meditate. He told of his asceticism, his hardships. On at least one occasion, he added the following concerning the cave:
And in some parts of Sufism—and so it is in reality—Sufis consider this body a cave. They consider this body, from head to foot, a stupendous cave. The caves outside, you can visit those too, but before we do that, let’s build up this cave.
The spirit is in this cave.
Let’s appreciate the spirit, let’s appreciate this cave. [Pointing to his chest:] This is the great cave, the cave of the spirit/of life. The others are external caves. When we train the Base Self in this cave, it’s done. There is also the path [leading up to the cave], the Prophet of God comes by that path.
The cave of the body. Don’t sleep, think about this for two-three days, because you haven’t heard it [before]. This cave is the seat of the Real (of God), the seat of the Koran, the seat of the Prophet of God. If, together with the Prophet of God, we train this cave, we will progress, Godwilling.
What shall we do? I’m always telling you. From here [the neck]  upwards, quit the Forbidden. Whether sight and hearing, smell, or food and drink, stop the Illicit. Down [there], stop Forbidden Lust. Do these two, and you’ll find that the cave is filled with light. Do this—I’m telling you for God’s sake.25

The Kaaba
The “Cube” (Kaaba) is the world center for Hajj, the Pilgrimage of Islam. Of a series of “centers of the world,” it is the last and, according to Muslims, now the universally valid center. (The Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem, where the Dome of the Rock now stands, was its predecessor.)
tb13

To recap “The Symbolism of the Center” from Mircea Eliade:
1. The Sacred Mountain — where heaven and earth meet — is situated at the center of the world.
2. Every temple or palace — and, by extension, every sacred city or royal residence — is a Sacred Mountain, thus becoming a Center.
3. Being an axis mundi, the sacred city or temple is regarded as the meeting point of heaven, earth, and hell.26
The Kaaba corresponds to the  “navel of the earth” (omphalos) also found in other traditions.
The Kaaba is situated on the ‘axis of the world’ and its four corners are oriented towards the cardinal regions of the sky. The rite of circumambulation expresses with precision the relationship existing between the sanctuary and the celestial movement; it is accomplished seven times to correspond with the number of the celestial spheres. [The lowest of these “heavens” corresponds to the observable physical universe.] 27
Cities and sacred places are assimilated to the summits of cosmic mountains. … According to Islamic tradition, the highest point on earth is the Kaaba, because “the polestar proves that … it lies over against the center of heaven.”28
“Highest point” spiritually, that is.
According to the Ancient Chinese, Chen-Jen, the True Man or Real Man, connects heaven and earth, and hence is identified with the World Axis. It is the same in the case of the Perfect Human in Sufism:
Thus the seat (the Arabic Word is markaz, which strictly means ‘centre’) of the supreme Pole (called al-Qutb al-Gawth…) is described symbolically as situated between heaven and earth, at a point which is exactly over the Ka‘bah which, precisely, has the form of a cube and which is itself one of the representations of ‘the Centre of the World’. 29
The Kaaba is considered to be the projection on earth of its heavenly archetype, the “Prosperous House” (bayt al-mamur, also called the “Visited House”).
tb14

Even more importantly, for Sufis the Kaaba is a symbol of the human Heart—not the physical heart that pumps blood, but its spiritual conjugate that keeps it beating. A Sufi story illustrates this nicely:
God said to David, “Build a house for Me.” David replied: “My Lord, you have no abode. You are beyond all and present everywhere. How should I build a house for You?” God said, “You are My abode. Keep My house free of everything other than Me.” So we should let nothing but God into our hearts. This is why the Prophet threw all idols out of the Kaaba, the House of God, and why it remains empty to this day: because it represents the condition our hearts should be in. As the Patriarch Abraham advises in Ibn Arabi’s Meccan Revelations:
“Make your heart like this Visited House, by being present with God in every state. Know that of all that you see, nothing contains the Real God except the heart of the believer, and that is you!” 30
(Note: This doesn’t mean we should love nothing else. We should love God more than anything else, love everything for the sake of God, and steer clear of the things God does not love. Paramount among these last: having other idols beside God, Illicit Gain and Illicit Sex.)
The Master said: “Mend a heart, you build the Kaaba. Break a heart, you wreck the Kaaba.” He also said:
My last will to you: Build a Heart, don’t break it. Don’t tear down the Kaʿba [the sacred sanctuary of the Heart]. Serve the Heart you’ve broken until you mend it. If you demolish the Kaʿba, how can you prostrate towards it?31
Like many others, I was brought up with a secular education. They taught us that Islam was the Five Pillars (saying the Word of Witnessing, performing the Prayer, Fasting, giving the Alms-tax, pilgrimage of the Hajj) and perhaps the Creed of Six Precepts. They didn’t teach us that Islam was also the above. Neither did they teach us the following:
If but once you break a heart
This Prayer you perform is void.
Even the seventy-two nations
Cannot wash your hands and face.
Knowledge is to know science
Knowledge is to Know Thyself
Whereas you don’t know yourself
What use is all this studying?
What you think for yourself
Think also for others
The meaning of the Four Books
Is this, if there is any.
Come, let us know each other
Let us make things easy
Let us love and be loved
Nobody survives this world. (—Yunus Emre)
Before going on, let us summarize the correspondences:

Fig: World Tree, Tuba Tree
Olive: World Tree, light
Mountain: body, head, World Mountain
Cave: body, Heart
Kaaba: Heart, World Center

The Universal Man
All this leads up to Verse 4 of the Chapter of the Fig: “We indeed created Man in the fairest stature.” This is what all those symbols have been referring to: the Universal Man or Perfect Human.
“Is Man a guest to the Universe, or is the Universe a guest to Man?” Master Kayhan posed the question, and he also supplied the answer (I am translating his speech about this for the first time):
If we look at its outward face, its appearance, Man is a guest to the Universe. First the Universe was created, then Man came. But on the other hand, God created the Light of Mohammed first, and created all the worlds from that. So the Universe came as a guest to Man.
He also wrote:
What are Man and Universe? The two are like twins, two lovers that complete each other. From another angle, Man and Universe are like a tree and its flower, its fruit.
What would the Universe do without Man? What would Man do without the Universe? The two complete one another. …
Man and Universe are like the two faces of a leaf; they can’t be separated.32
tb15
Alif, the Cosmic Pillar that some have viewed as the spinal cord of the universe. Although it is depicted above in the direction of the time axis, it should be kept in mind that it is orthogonal (perpendicular) to all dimensions, including time.
(Incidentally, note the resemblance of the cosmos, as depicted above, with the headpiece of a whirling dervish. Sufis also had a two-pleated “crown of Alif” which resembled the flame of a candle. A sharper-tipped version of this was called the “swordlike cap.”)
The candle of the spirit has such a flame
That it cannot fit under the bell-jar of the [universe].
—Shaykh Galib

The Fall
The next verse (Verse 5) reads:
Then We reduced him to the lowest of the low.
And that is our sorry state today. This is the Fall of Man.
But fear not! For Verse 6 gives good tidings of our redemption: “Save those who believe and do good deeds, and theirs is a reward unfailing.” Another Chapter adds: “Surely Man is in loss, except for those who believe, do good works, and counsel Truth and patience to one another” (103:2-3).
So even in our fallen condition, the door of hope is open to all of us.

——————
*But of course, God knows best. Even if this conjecture is incorrect, at least it has led us to the contemplation of sublime matters.


1. Karen Shoren Strawn, “Growing a Taproot in Shaky Ground: The Use of Healing Gardens in Places of Suffering,” Thesis 2011-2013, Upaya Zen Center, Santa Fe, New Mexico, p. 9.
2. A.K. Coomaraswamy, “The Inverted Tree. The Tree of Brahma. The Bodhi Tree.”
3. Emily Pott, “The Zaqqūm Tree,” p. 102 & 102n10.
4. Katha Upanishad, II, iii, 1.
5. Coomaraswamy, “The Inverted Tree…”
6. Pott, “The Zaqqūm Tree,” p. 102n10 and p. 105n20.
7. Plato, Timaeus 90a7-b2.
8. Pott, “The Zaqqūm Tree,” p. 102n8.
9. Laleh Bakhtiar, Sufi: Expressions of the Mystic Quest, section entitled “Cosmological Symbols.”
10. Quoted in Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī, (Mulla Sadra Shirazi), Divine Manifestations Concerning the Secrets of the Perfecting Sciencesp. 152.
11. Bakhtiar, “Cosmological Symbols.”
12. Henri Corbin, “Mundus Imaginalis, or the Imaginary and the Imaginal.”
13. H. Bayman, “Star Wars and Sufism.”
14. René Guénon, Symbolism of the Cross, Ghent, NY: Sophia Perennis, 1996 [1931], p. 113.
15. H. Bayman, “Superheroes and Sufism.”
16. C.G. Jung, quoted here (p. 87).
17. Mircea Eliade, Patterns in Comparative Religion, quoted here (p. 87).
21. Pronounced as “You-noose Am-ray,” with the ending “y” inaudible. Famous Turkish Sufi poet.
22. “But you cannot see My face, for no one may see Me and live.”—Exodus 33:20.
23. From Henry Bayman, The Teachings of a Perfect Master, Oxford, UK: Anqa Publishing, 2012.
24. René Guénon, Fundamental Symbols, Cambridge, UK: Quinta Essentia, 1995 [1962], pp. 145-148.
25. Ahmet Kayhan, videotaped conversation, March 6, 1998. (This is being translated for the first time.)
27. Titus Burckhardt, “The Universality of Sacred Art,” p. 6n9.
29. René Guénon, Fundamental Symbols, pp. 79-80.
30. Stephen Hirtenstein, “The Brotherhood of Milk.”
31. H. Bayman, The Teachings of a Perfect Master, p. 12.
32. Ahmet Kayhan, Adem ve Alem (Turkish: “Man and Universe,” 1989), p. 7.